Coevolving Innovations

… in Business Organizations and Information Technologies

Systems Theory, Systems Philosophy, Systems Methodology via Bela H. Banathy (1985)

The International Society for General Systems Research formed circa 1956 became the International Society for the Systems Sciences in 1988.  In 1985, Bela H. Banathy organized the annual meeting on the theme of “Systems Inquiring”.  Proceedings normally are published in the year following.  In 1987, John A. Dillon summarized Banathy’s perspective in the yearbook, General Systems.  For easy reading, here’s an excerpt from the yearbook.

— begin excerpt —

EDITORIAL PREFACE

Systems Inquiring

One of the few perquisites which come to the President of the International Society for General Systems Research is that he or she can determine the theme of the Annual Conference. In 1985, President Bela Banathy selected the topic, Systems Inquiring as the focal point of the Conference.

Because his Introduction to that conference represents an excellent, concise description of the whole field of systems science, we shall begin this volume by quoting it here.

“Systems Inquiring involves both conclusion oriented disciplined inquiry or knowledge production and decision oriented disciplined inquiry, which makes use of knowledge produced by systems research and by the various disciplines. Systems Inquiring draws upon the three domains of systems scholarship: systems theory, systems philosophy, and systems methodology.

The program of the 1985 Annual Meeting of the Society embraces the entire scope of Systems Inquiry, by which:
SYSTEMS PHILOSOPHY is explicated and evolved,
SYSTEMS THEORY is defined and formulated through its continuous evolution, and
SYSTEMS METHODOLOGY is pursued as a field of study as well as implemented in a variety of contexts and through a variety of strategies and methods.

The 1985 Meeting has a special theme: the definition and characterization of competences required or desired for engaging in systems inquiry. The special theme addresses the following question: What knowledge, understanding, ways of thinking, skills, and dispositions are involved in:
(1) pursuing scholarship in systems theory, philosophy, and methodology, and
(2) applying systems thinking and theory and using systerms methodology in the disciplines, professions, and various human activity systems from local to global.
A follow-up question is also addressed:
What are arrangements that facilitate the acquisition of competence in systems inquiry.
A “map” of the program is displayed in the Figure on the following page.

Map by Beal H. Banathy, via John A. Dillon: Systems Theory, Systems Philosophy, Systems Methodology

Based on the scheme described above and depicted in the program “map,” the program is organized in the following areas:

  • SYSTEMS THEORY (general theory, duality theory, self-reflexive structures, and hierarchy theory)
  • SYSTEMS PHILOSOPHY
  • SYSTEMS METHODOLOGY
  • APPLICATIONS IN THE DISCIPLINES
  • APPLICATIONS IN THE PROFESSIONS
  • APPLICATIONS IN HUMAN ACTIVITY SYSTEMS
  • APPLICATIONS IN GLOBAL ISSUES
  • THE ACQUISITION AND TRANSMISSION OF COMPETENCE IN SYSTEMS INQUIRY

The program areas are briefly described next:

Systems Theory

The ultimate foundation of competence in systems inquiry is significant command of the principal systems concepts and the theoretical models of the field. Therefore, all sessions of the systems theory segment of the 1985 conference focus on empirical verification, extension, or theoretical development of: any isomorphy, or its formal expression; any connected set of isomorphies; and specified interaction among isomorphies; any trans-disciplinary model; or any attempt at synthesizing a comprehensive survey (glossary) of systems terms. The term isomorphy here is used as defined in society publications, that is, any formal similarity between specific systems of different scales of magnitude or different disciplines.

[….]

Systems Philosophy

Systems Philosophy seeks to express a common core of concepts recognizable and adhered to by systems theorists and practitioners. It also seeks to put systems theory itself in larger contexts. Contributions include demonstrations and discussions of competence in systems philosophy. An internal focus on the nature of systems philosophy is complemented by philosophical focus on the larger wholes of which systems ideas are a part.

As the philosophy theme segment unfolds, our philosophic traditions are represented together with the current expressions of the perennial tension between rational and intuitive systems-thinking styles. As coherence develops, images of future systems philosophies are expected to emerge.

Systems Methodology

The term “systems methodology” is viewed as a coherent collection of methods for dealing with systems phenomena. Three categories of methods are recognized:

(1) Methods for studying various classes of systems with the aim of determining their desired characteristics. These methods produce systems knowledge.

(2) Methods for dealing with the various types of systems problems. Included are the non-trivial issues of problem formulation. This category of systems methodology is often referred to as systems problem solving.

(3) Methods for determining meta characteristics of the various methods in categories (1) and (2).

In systems inquiry, methods are always considered in the context of specific problem situations. This primacy of the problem situation is in sharp contrast with the primacy of methods in applied mathematics or in the traditional disciplines.

In the spirit of the central theme of the conference, contributions define and characterize competencies in working in any of the categories described above.

— end excerpt —

The text on application areas and development of competences are left for the diligent reader to seek out the original yearbook!

Presidents of the society after Bela H. Banathy and John A. Dillon were Peter B. Checkland and Russell L. Ackoff.  Ackoff founded the Social Systems Science program at University of Pennsylvania, and drove the name change to the current “Systems Sciences”.  Newcomers to the field might reflect if the original ideas have persisted to today.

References

Dillon, John A. 1987. “Editorial Preface: Systems Inquiring.” Edited by John A. Dillon. General Systems, Yearbook of the International Society for General Systems Research, XXX:ii–v.  https://www.isss.org/yearbooks/

1 Comment


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • RSS qoto.org/@daviding (Mastodon)

  • RSS on IngBrief

    • Notion of Change in the Yijing | JeeLoo Lin 2017
      The appreciation of change is different in Western philosophy than in classical Chinese philosophy. JeeLoo Lin published a concise contrast on differences. Let me parse the Introduction to the journal article, that is so clearly written. The Chinese theory of time is built into a language that is tenseless. The Yijing (Book of Changes) there […]
    • World Hypotheses (Stephen C. Pepper) as a pluralist philosophy [Rescher, 1994]
      In trying to place the World Hypotheses work of Stephen C. Pepper (with multiple root metaphors), Nicholas Rescher provides a helpful positioning. — begin paste — Philosophical perspectivism maintains that substantive philosophical positions can be maintained only from a “perspective” of some sort. But what sort? Clearly different sorts of perspectives can be conceived of, […]
    • The Nature and Application of the Daodejing | Ames and Hall (2003)
      Ames and Hall (2003) provide some tips for those studyng the DaoDeJing.
    • Diachronic, diachrony
      Finding proper words to express system(s) change(s) can be a challenge. One alternative could be diachrony. The Oxford English dictionary provides two definitions for diachronic, the first one most generally related to time. (The second is linguistic method) diachronic ADJECTIVE Oxford English Dictionary, s.v. “diachronic (adj.), sense 1,” July 2023, https://doi.org/10.1093/OED/3691792233. For completeness, prochronic relates “to […]
    • Introduction, “Systems Thinking: Selected Readings, volume 2”, edited by F. E. Emery (1981)
      The selection of readings in the “Introduction” to Systems Thinking: Selected Readings, volume 2, Penguin (1981), edited by Fred E. Emery, reflects a turn from 1969 when a general systems theory was more fully entertained, towards an urgency towards changes in the world that were present in 1981. Systems thinking was again emphasized in contrast […]
    • Introduction, “Systems Thinking: Selected Readings”, edited by F. E. Emery (1969)
      In reviewing the original introduction for Systems Thinking: Selected Readings in the 1969 Penguin paperback, there’s a few threads that I only recognize, many years later. The tables of contents (disambiguating various editions) were previously listed as 1969, 1981 Emery, System Thinking: Selected Readings. — begin paste — Introduction In the selection of papers for this […]
  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • RSS on daviding.com

    • 2024/11 Moments November 2024
      Road trip to Rochester NY and Ithaca, with visits to art galleries as the days get shorter.
    • 2024/10 Moments October 2024
      Journey from Lugano Switzerland, return via Milan Italy, to fall in Toronto
    • 2024/09 Moments September 2024
      September neighbourhood music performances, day out with father, son's birthday party, travel via Milan to Genoa, systems conversation in Lugano
    • 2024/08 Moments August 2024
      Summer finishing with family events, and lots of outdoor music performances, captured with a new mirrorless camera for video from mid-month
    • 2024/07 Moments July 2024
      Summer festivals and music incubator shows in Toronto, all within biking distance.
    • 2024/06 Moments June 2024
      Summer jazz at the Distillery District, in Washington DC while at the annual systems conference, and then Toronto Jazz Festival
  • RSS on Media Queue

    • What to Do When It’s Too Late | David L. Hawk | 2024
      David L. Hawk (American management theorist, architect, and systems scientist) has been hosting a weekly television show broadcast on Bold Brave Tv from the New York area on Wednesdays 6pm ET, remotely from his home in Iowa. Live, callers can join…Read more ›
    • 2021/06/17 Keekok Lee | Philosophy of Chinese Medicine 2
      Following the first day lecture on Philosophy of Chinese Medicine 1 for the Global University for Sustainability, Keekok Lee continued on a second day on some topics: * Anatomy as structure; physiology as function (and process); * Process ontology, and thing ontology; * Qi ju as qi-in-concentrating mode, and qi san as qi-in-dissipsating mode; and […]
    • 2021/06/16 Keekok Lee | Philosophy of Chinese Medicine 1
      The philosophy of science underlying Classical Chinese Medicine, in this lecture by Keekok Lee, provides insights into ways in which systems change may be approached, in a process ontology in contrast to the thing ontology underlying Western BioMedicine. Read more ›
    • 2021/02/02 To Understand This Era, You Need to Think in Systems | Zeynep Tufekci with Ezra Klein | New York Times
      In conversation, @zeynep with @ezraklein reveal authentic #SystemsThinking in (i) appreciating that “science” is constructed by human collectives, (ii) the west orients towards individual outcomes rather than population levels; and (iii) there’s an over-emphasis on problems of the moment, and…Read more ›
    • 2019/04/09 Art as a discipline of inquiry | Tim Ingold (web video)
      In the question-answer period after the lecture, #TimIngold proposes art as a discipline of inquiry, rather than ethnography. This refers to his thinking On Human Correspondence. — begin paste — [75m26s question] I am curious to know what art, or…Read more ›
    • 2019/10/16 | “Bubbles, Golden Ages, and Tech Revolutions” | Carlota Perez
      How might our society show value for the long term, over the short term? Could we think about taxation over time, asks @carlotaprzperez in an interview: 92% for 1 day; 80% within 1 month; 50%-60% tax for 1 year; zero tax for 10 years.Read more ›
  • Meta

  • Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
    Theme modified from DevDmBootstrap4 by Danny Machal