Doug Schuler joined the monthly Systems Thinking Ontario meeting for a conversation about the potential for patterns and pattern languages to help address wicked problems on a large scale, via technology, loose coordination, and social commitments.
Doug was exposed to the original A Pattern Language in the mid-1970s. It aimed to generate towns and buildings that would be alive and life-affirming. That framework and perspective served to orient and structure collaboration under the auspices of Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility (CPSR). The Directions and Implications of Advanced Computing conference in 2001 attracted over 100 pattern proposals. These were ultimately transformed into the Liberating Voices pattern language containing 136 patterns by 75 authors. This body of work is available online and in a book published by MIT Press in 2008.
This pattern language addresses collaboration and civic intelligence, a critical under-developed resource necessary for democratic societies and public problem solving. Doug has led workshops in his teaching at the Evergreen State College, and with community groups designing actions and projects, around the world.
The video file is archived on the Internet Archive .
Audio playable onto mobile devices was transcoded to MP3 from the video.
Douglas Schuler is currently chair of ACM SIGCAS and president of the Public Sphere Project as a non-profit organization in the State of Washington.… Read more (in a new tab)
Literacy has been proposed as an understanding of a small number of pervasive principles appropriate to making informed personal and societal decisions.
- Systems literacy includes an understanding of systems that influence you, and your influence on systems.
Peter Tuddenham has been leading an initiative on Systems Literacy across a variety of systems organizations, particularly with the International Society for the Systems Sciences, where he was president (2018-2019).
Peter joined Systems Thinking Ontario in conversation, to share his going work, with the College of Exploration. He also invited participants to join in the monthly scheduled Cafe and Pub.
The video file is archived on the Internet Archive .
Audio downloadable onto mobile devices was also produced M4A.
Open access versions of papers by Peter D. Tuddenham may be available on his ResearchGate page and/or his Academia.edu page.
This session was one in the Systems Thinking Ontario series.
The Creative Systemic Research Platform (CSRP) Institute, led by Susu Nousala and Jelena Sucic, is distinctive in approaching systemic design from a bottom-up, longitudinal perspective. The co-presidents were able to join us in conversation at a Systems Thinking Ontario session, remotely from Finland and Switzerland, at a significant time disadvantage.
Many approaches to systemic design presume a top-down, abstract predisposition of a world that might be. The Creative Systemic approach emphasizes learning within communities towards the development of resilience. Scholarly communities are nurtured at a local level, distributed across multiple peri-urban regional geographies. The work of mapping and investigating emerging economies is informed by activities that include creative expression in social complexity that produces communal well-being.
- Susu Nousala is a professor with the College of Design and Innovation, Tongji University, Shanghai (People’s Republic of China). She has previously had research positions at Aalto University (Finland), University of Melbourne (Australia), and Chiang Mai University (Thailand).
- Jelena Sucic is a researcher in systemic design and sustainable processes based in Switzerland. She previously led as the field specialist and project manager in the nascent research group, as she completed a double degree in the PoliTong project, completing a Master of Fine Arts in Product Service Service Design at Tongi University, simultaneously with a Master of Science in Systemic Design at Politecnico di Torino.
For brevity, the usual circle of introduction was requested written in chat, rather as verbal self-introductions. This meant that our featured speakers start just a few minutes into the web video . … Read more (in a new tab)
To appreciate how systemicists worldwide collaborate, Gary S. Metcalf joined Systems Thinking Ontario for a conversation. Gary served as president of the International Society for the Systems Sciences 2007-2008, and of the International Federation for Sysrtems Research 2010-2016. From 2003 to 2018, he was a graduate instructor in Organizational Systems and Research on the faculty of Saybrook University.
The Systems Movement “may be characterized as a loose association of people from different disciplines of science, engineering, philosophy, and other areas, who share a common interest in ideas (concepts, principles, methods, etc.) that are applicable to all systems and that, consequently, transcend the boundaries between traditional disciplines.” (George Klir, Facets of Systems Science, 2001).
After the standard round of introductions, the conversation began with Gary speaking a little about his background, and how he came to the systems community after graduate studies in family therapy (in the web video, at about 22m42s in). Participants were invited to ask questions and make comments freely.
The video file are archived on the Internet Archive .
For those who prefer digital audio on mobile devices, the audio was extracted as M4A from the video.
Since this talk, Gary has added to his writing and editing scholarly non-fiction works, with a new direction in science fiction. … Read more (in a new tab)
While the term “theory of change” is often used by funders expecting an outcome of systems change for their investment, is there really a theory there?
The November 2020 Systems Thinking Ontario session was an opportunity for Peter H. Jones (OCADU) and Ryan J. A. Murphy (Memorial U. of Newfoundland) to extend talks that they had given over a few days for the Relating Systems Thinking and Design (RSD9) Symposium.
The talks covered some early research and conversation on deepening the understanding of “theories of change”. After our usual round of self-introductions by meeting attendees, the core content starts in the web video recording after 12m45s.
The video file is also viewable and downloadable at the Internet Archive,
The digital audio was extracted from the video, and transcoded to MP3.
Here is the original abstract from the Systems Thinking Ontario November 9, 2020, session.
— begin paste —
Redesigning Our Theories of Theories of Change
Peter Jones presents a customized talk from the RSD9 plenary session for ST ON. Ryan Murphy joins with a full presentation of his RSD9 talk.
We often use the model of “theories of change” to argue for the process by which envisioned change programs might achieve their goals. Essentially these are the working theories by which we explain the logic of system change outcomes, and we often include quasi-systemic logic models to communicate them.… Read more (in a new tab)
For the third of three workshops by the Systems Changes Learning Circle in October 2020, Kelly Okamura, Dan Eng and Joanne Dong led a Beacon Event for Global Change Days.
This session was one in a series for global changemakers. Our expectation was that they would be hands-on practitioners, with relatively low familiarity with systems thinking methods and theory.
The workshop orientations were relatively short, with most of the time dedicated to two breakout periods. In the web video, the plenary discussions and group readouts are included, with the parallel breakout conversations omitted.
The video file is accessible on the Internet Archive, should viewers want a downloadable version.
The digital audio is available as MP3 for those with mobile players.
Here is the original description for the session.
— begin paste —
This interactive beacon session will engage change makers to think differently, to explore their relationship to learning.
The breakout sessions will provide participants an opportunity to explore the Systems Thinking questions: the urgent vs the important, the local vs. the distant, problem solving vs history-making. Finally the audience will be invited to review their self-reflections and the potential re-ordering of their priorities, to make a difference.
— end paste —
Workshop attendees were quite engaged with the challenge of making distinctions that we’ve been discussing within the Systems Changes Learning Circle. … Read more (in a new tab)