Coevolving Innovations

… in Business Organizations and Information Technologies

Books in print as scarce resources

I’m giving a lecture on business innovation at the University of Hull Business School this week. Preparing the lecture, I thought I might start with Schumpeter. Although some of the 1934 work, The Theory of Economic Development, is available on books.google.com, the more popular 1943 work, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (which writes more about “creative destruction“) isn’t.

Jennifer took me over to the University of Hull library, where there’s a really old volume, with the following publication information.

First published in the U.S.A.

Published in Great Britain in 1943

{begin logo}

Book Production War Economy Standard

{end logo}

The paper and binding of this book comform to the authorized economy standard

Printed in Great Britain by Herson and Spaulding, London W.1

Following up on the “War Economy Standard” leads to a web page where there is a full description that …

There are many more words on each page than would be desirable in normal times: margins have been reduced and no space has been wasted between chapters.

In Britain, there seems to have been a practice of rationing that came from World War II, that ended in 1954 (so that bananas were no longer controlled).

Now that major sections of books are often available for free on the Internet, the rationing of written content is an anachronism. I was amused that the University of Hull library required that Jennifer sign me in as a visitor, because I wasn’t even permitted to browse books without authorized identification. Of course, this 1943 edition of the book is still available to readers as an actively circulating book … but I would have thought that more academics would encourage reading Schumpeter than discouraging it.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • RSS qoto.org/@daviding (Mastodon)

  • RSS on IngBrief

    • Reformation and transformation (Ackoff 2003, 2010)
      In his system of system concepts, Russell Ackoff made the distinction between reformation and transformation in many of his lectures. Here are two written sources. From Redesigining Society (2003) … Systemic Transformation A system is transformed, as contrasted with reformed, when its structure or functions are changed fundamentally. Such changes are discontinuous and qualitative, quantum […]
    • Goal, objective, ideal, pursuits (Ackoff & Emery, 1972)
      While Ackoff’s definitions of goals, objectives and ideals have been republished (and rewritten) multiple times, the 1972 definitions were derived from his original dissertation work.  Accordingly, in addition to the human-readable definitions, some mathematical notation is introduced. — begin paste — OUTCOMES 2.30. End (an immediate intended outcome) of a subject A in a particular […]
    • Pure Inquiring Systems: Antiteleology | The Design of Inquiring Systems | C. West Churchman | 1971
      The fifth way of knowing, as described by West Churchman, is a Singerian inquiring system. (This fifth way of knowing is more colloquially called Unbounded Systems Thinking in Mitroff and Linstone (1993)). The book On Purposeful Systems (Ackoff and Emery, 1972) was derived by Ackoff’s dissertation that was controversially coauthored with West Churchman. Purpose can […]
    • Process-Function Ecology, Wicked Problems, Ecological Evolution | Vasishth | Spanda J | 2015
      Understanding Process-Function Ecology by Ashwani Vasishth leads to luminaries in the systems sciences, including C. West Churchman, Eugene P. Odum and Timothy F.H. Allen.
    • The Innovation Delusion | Lee Vinsel, Andrew L. Russell | 2020
      As an irony, the 2020 book, The Innovation Delusion by #LeeVinsel @STS_News + #AndrewLRussell @RussellProf shouldn’t be seen as an innovation, but an encouragement to join @The_Maintainers where an ongoing thought network can continue. The subtitle “How Our Obsession with the New has Disrupted the Work That Matters Most” recognizes actual innovation, as distinct from […]
    • Republishing on Facebook as “good for the world” or “bad for the world” (NY Times, 2020/11/24)
      An online social network reproduces content partially based on algorithms, and partially based on the judgements made by human beings. Either may be viewed as positive or negative. > The trade-offs came into focus this month [November 2020], when Facebook engineers and data scientists posted the results of a series of experiments called “P(Bad for […]
  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • RSS on daviding.com

  • RSS on Media Queue

  • Meta

  • Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
    Theme modified from DevDmBootstrap4 by Danny Machal