Coevolving Innovations

… in Business Organizations and Information Technologies

Resurrecting a persona for business

Should a blog reflect more than one persona?

Last week, I had practically written an obituary for this website, and was planning on integrating my personas on the blog at daviding.com. Reversing myself (as I’ve done before), I’ve decided that it makes more sense to maintain a professional persona (of interest to business thinkers) in addition to my non-work persona. There’s two motivations for this.

Firstly, I once asked a person I respect why he doesn’t read blogs. He said that it’s because it seems that there are lot of people blogging about their cats (or other irrelevant topics). I was reading Luis Suarez’s blog about the IBM blogroll list, and it occurred to me that while my family isn’t particularly interested in my workday activities, my professional colleagues may not be that interested in the photoblogging on travel and family in my personal life.

Secondly, I think that the reason that people don’t read blogs is that they’re web-based interfaces that readers have to remember to check. The best remedy for this is an RSS reader, but most business professionals are more comfortable with their e-mail clients, and haven’t seen a reason to switch. I’ve found a great solution to this on WordPress with the Email Notification Plugin. It sends a teaser to subscribers — without necessarily sending the whole entry. This is a great solution, it doesn’t support the complexity of satisfying multiple groups with different interests. Thus, the next best alternative is … two blogs.

In taking this new direction, I’m not precluding either Doug or Martin from blogging on this site, but I think that you’ll see over time that my professional persona will become more dominant here. You’ll already see this with the change in look-and-feel (to parallel the other blog, for lower maintenance!) as well as aggregators in the right column of both blogs the cross-link the entries. In addition, there are pointers to two other web sites where I’m putting some effort: on the Rendez research project on innovation; and on the Semkibs community on service engineering and management with a focus on Knowledge-Intensive Business Services. (They also support RSS readers … if you’re one of those people who use one!)


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • RSS qoto.org/@daviding (Mastodon)

  • RSS on IngBrief

    • Goal, objective, ideal, pursuits (Ackoff & Emery, 1972)
      While Ackoff’s definitions of goals, objectives and ideals have been republished (and rewritten) multiple times, the 1972 definitions were derived from his original dissertation work.  Accordingly, in addition to the human-readable definitions, some mathematical notation is introduced. — begin paste — OUTCOMES 2.30. End (an immediate intended outcome) of a subject A in a particular […]
    • Pure Inquiring Systems: Antiteleology | The Design of Inquiring Systems | C. West Churchman | 1971
      The fifth way of knowing, as described by West Churchman, is a Singerian inquiring system. (This fifth way of knowing is more colloquially called Unbounded Systems Thinking in Mitroff and Linstone (1993)). The book On Purposeful Systems (Ackoff and Emery, 1972) was derived by Ackoff’s dissertation that was controversially coauthored with West Churchman. Purpose can […]
    • Process-Function Ecology, Wicked Problems, Ecological Evolution | Vasishth | Spanda J | 2015
      Understanding Process-Function Ecology by Ashwani Vasishth leads to luminaries in the systems sciences, including C. West Churchman, Eugene P. Odum and Timothy F.H. Allen.
    • The Innovation Delusion | Lee Vinsel, Andrew L. Russell | 2020
      As an irony, the 2020 book, The Innovation Delusion by #LeeVinsel @STS_News + #AndrewLRussell @RussellProf shouldn’t be seen as an innovation, but an encouragement to join @The_Maintainers where an ongoing thought network can continue. The subtitle “How Our Obsession with the New has Disrupted the Work That Matters Most” recognizes actual innovation, as distinct from […]
    • Republishing on Facebook as “good for the world” or “bad for the world” (NY Times, 2020/11/24)
      An online social network reproduces content partially based on algorithms, and partially based on the judgements made by human beings. Either may be viewed as positive or negative. > The trade-offs came into focus this month [November 2020], when Facebook engineers and data scientists posted the results of a series of experiments called “P(Bad for […]
    • 1969, 1981 Emery, System Thinking: Selected Readings
      Social Systems Science graduate students in 1970s-1980s with #RussellAckoff, #EricTrist + #HasanOzbehkhan at U. Pennsylvania Wharton School were assigned the Penguin paperback #SystemsThinking reader edited by #FredEEmery, with updated editions evolving contents.
  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • RSS on daviding.com

  • RSS on Media Queue

  • Meta

  • Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
    Theme modified from DevDmBootstrap4 by Danny Machal