Coevolving Innovations

… in Business Organizations and Information Technologies

Resequencing Systems Thinking | U. Hull Centre for Systems Studies | 2024-05-13

On my May trip through the UK, I accepted an offer to lead an Expert-Led Session at the University of Hull.  I had previously been a Research Fellow of the Centre for Systems Studies, but haven’t travelled to the Hull for some years.  As we worked out the arrangements, I found out that the seminar wasn’t just an hour lecture, but a complete afternoon.

The Systems Changes Learning Circle is now in year 6 of an espoused 10-year journey.  The target audience of graduate students and faculty, with the luxury of time for lecturing and discussing, allowed for an extended exposition of our learning on systems changes.  The ouline covered:

  • A. Initiating
  • B. Philosophizing
  • C. Theorizing
  • D. Practising
  • E. Continuing

This series of 4 recordings is available as a playlist on Youtube.  We started off mostly with reviewing slides, and then had progressed to more interactive discussion later in the day.  With the audio recordings, the presentation slides (including movies) were resynchronized as post-production.

This presentation segments are downloadable from this website, as well as from the Internet Archive .

Video May 13, 2024 — H.264 MP4
Part 1
(58m02s)
[20240513_1231_UHull_Ing ResequencingSystemsThinking_Part1of4_1203kpbs.m4v]
(HD 1203kbps 573MB)
[on the Internet Archive]

  • 00:00 Welcome by Amanda Gregory
  • 03:15 A. Initiating
  • 09:35 B. Philosophizing
  • 10:52 B1. ↓ Metaphilosophy; ↑ Postcolonial Constructionist
  • 29:53 B2. ↓ Behavioral Structuralist; ↑ Ecological Processualist
  • 38:08 B3. ↓ Progress → Ideals; ↑ (Con)textualism-Dyadicism
  • 56:23 B4. Exercise: ↓ Structure then process; ↑ Process then structure
Part 2
(27m58s)
[20240513_1350_UHull_Ing ResequencingSystemsThinking_Part2of4_0968kbps.m4v]
(HD 968kbps 228MB)
[on the Internet Archive]

  • 00:00 C. Theorizing
  • 00:35 C1. ↓ Linear Movement; ↑ Rhythmic Complements
  • 12:13 C2. ↓ Progressive Development; ↑ (Con)textural Threading
  • 16:35 C3. ↓ Directional Control; ↑ Implicit Propensities
  • 23:44 C4. Exercise: ↓ Hastening / Retarding; ↑ Comping
Part 3
(48m16s)
[20240513_1441_UHull_Ing ResequencingSystemsThinking_Part3of4_1096kpbs.m4v]
(HD 1096kbps 438MB)
[on the Internet Archive]

  • 00:00 Classroom Discussion after Exercise C4
  • 08:09 D. Practising
  • 08:48 D1. ↓ Unfreezing-Refreezing; ↑ (Con)textural Action Learning
  • 19:28 D2. ↓ Intention; ↑ Attention
  • 24:38 D3. ↓ Adaptive Problem Solving; ↑ Learning Better Questions
  • 45:56 D4. Exercise: ↓ Bias for Action (Youwei); ↑ Doing No Harm (Wuwei)
Part 4
(29m38s)
[20240513_1548_UHull_Ing ResequencingSystemsThinking_Part4of4_1277kbps.m4v]
(HD 1277kbps 307MB)
[on the Internet Archive]

  • 00:00 Classroom Discussion after Exercise D4
  • 25:05 E. Continuing

In the June newsletter on Systems Prospects from the Centre for Systems Studies, PhD Student Gemma Smith contributed a relfection on the session:

Contribution from the CSS PhD community

On the 13th of May 2024, I had the pleasure of attending the CSS expert led session by David Ing, titled: Resequencing Systems Thinking: Practising, Theorizing and Philosophizing as Systems Changes Learning. I thoroughly enjoyed the session, which provided a challenging yet interesting perspective on systems thinking. It expanded my understanding by introducing new concepts and challenging my initial views. The session was broken down in to exploring the Philosophy of the contrast between organicism and contextualism. We built upon this with the theory surrounding rhythm in behaviour and time, and concluded with the practical application of how these principles could be applied to the conflict between a bias for action and doing no harm.

Here are a few of my key takeaways regarding the concepts of the dualities in Systems Thinking, Dyadic behaviours, and reflective inquiry. The emphasis on dualities was encapsulated by the concept that “there is no singular.” This was reinforced through learning about yin and yang, demonstrating how these dualities are essential for understanding and managing systems and how these contrasts between eastern holism and western philosophies. Exploring dyadic behaviour and rhythms highlighted their importance in systems to me, emphasising the role of time and rhythms. I found the discussion on how reordering pace can reveal the ‘right’ moments for intervention within a system insightful. During the session, we explored the concepts of rhythms and dyadic behaviours, gaining a new perspective on networks as connected points in time. This was described as a “meshwork of entangled lines, trails of wayfaring along which lives are lived.” Reflective inquiry was evident throughout the session; this involves questioning established norms and seeking different solutions that are contextually relevant and dynamically adaptable. Within our table, we discussed the notion of bias to act within a situation, for example if a consultant is hired to solve a problem, a solution of do nothing or wait, is unlikely to be welcomed in a fast paced, business driven environment. A quote relating to reflective inquiry which stuck with me from this session was:

“No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it’s not the same river and he’s not the same man.” – Heraclitus

This reinforced for me that the learning process of experience is central in adaptive management and how this is a core fundamental in within taking a systems approach to tackling an issue.

I am thankful to have attended as this session provided great insights and just like in the metaphor where systems are weaves of thread; this meeting of people within the session, the facilitation and presentation by David Ing, and the meaningful conversations, was a meeting of threads which was beneficial to my learning journey in systems thinking. This was a whistle stop tour of my takeaways as a participant, if you would like to explore these topics further see here:

The coevolve website: https://coevolving.com/commons/

The presentation and session information: https://coevolving.com/commons/2024-05-resequencing-systems-thinking

Gemma Smith

PhD student, The Centre for Systems Studies

Here is the original session description that was sent in advance.


Since 2017, the term “systems change” has emerged in publications of the OECD, United Nations Development Program, and the Social Innovation Exchange. Does this represent a minor variation on systems approaches from the 20th century, or is it a call for a dramatic rethinking ?

“Rethinking Systems Thinking” was the theme of the 2012 meeting of the International Society for the Systems Sciences. In 2019, the Systems Changes Learning Circle was founded in Toronto, Canada, on an espoused 10-year journey to explore that rethinking. Action learning on methods has involved pilot workshops from 2022, three published journal articles, and another manuscript in final review for 2024.

The rise of interest in systems changes has provoked inquiry into whether systems approaches might be resequenced. An aligning of systems practices, systems theories, and philosophies of science enables rigorous grounding for authentic systems thinking.

Motivated towards developing practices associated with systems changes, sequencing matters. Practising systems changes places when+where ahead of what+why. Theorizing systems changes centers on shifting rhythms, reweaving (con)textures, and repacing propensities. Philosophizing systems changes enters metaphilosophy for a postcolonial science that sweeps in Classical Chinese foundations in yinyang and daojia.

This expert-led session will be in segmented into iterations of presentation, group discussion, and collective reflection.

Session participants will learn about ways that Systems Changes Learning approach is evolving, and the turn towards explaining and mentoring in the latter 5 years of the journey .

Slides are posted at https://coevolving.com/commons/2024-05-resequencing-systems-thinking

Resequencing Systems Thinking | U. Hull Centre for Systems Studies | 2024-05-13


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • RSS qoto.org/@daviding (Mastodon)

    • daviding: “Web video from U. Hull Centre for Systems Studies expert-led…” August 11, 2024
      Web video from U. Hull Centre for Systems Studies expert-led session on "Resequencing #SystemsThinking: Practising, Theorizing and Philosophizing as Systems Changes Learning", 4 parts, ~ 3 hours. https://coevolving.com/blogs/index.php/archive/resequencing-systems-thinking-u-hull/ Slides at https://coevolving.com/commons/2024-05-resequencing-systems-thinking need talk, animation.
    • daviding: “Scholarly rankings of #SystemsThinkers may not line up with …” August 6, 2024
      Scholarly rankings of #SystemsThinkers may not line up with popularization. Counting h-index is different from number of citations. https://coevolving.com/blogs/index.php/archive/citation-rankings-for-some-systems-thinkers/
    • daviding: “Serious about a postcolonial philosophy of Chinese science? …” August 2, 2024
      Serious about a postcolonial philosophy of Chinese science? Web video of "Yinyang and Daojia into #SystemsThinking through Changes" for #EQLab traces through history + the contextural-dyadic shift for #SystemsChange https://coevolving.com/blogs/index.php/archive/yinyang-and-daojia-into-systems-thinking/
    • daviding: “If an LLM is going to run in your phone, the model is going …” July 31, 2024
      If an LLM is going to run in your phone, the model is going to have to be small. > Paradoxically, smaller models require more training to reach the same level of performance. So the downward pressure on model size is putting upward pressure on training compute. "AI scaling myths" | Arvind Narayanan + Sayish […]
    • daviding: “Running an open source LLM requires a lot of resources. The …” July 31, 2024
      Running an open source LLM requires a lot of resources. The smallest model may run on a powerful laptop, but beyond that, you'll need a server. Besides the GPU (probably Nvidia), check out the disk space requirement for Llama 3.1 8b parameters, 4.7GB70b parameters, 40GB405b parameters, 231GBhttps://ollama.com/library/llama3.1:70b
  • RSS on IngBrief

    • World Hypotheses (Stephen C. Pepper) as a pluralist philosophy [Rescher, 1994]
      In trying to place the World Hypotheses work of Stephen C. Pepper (with multiple root metaphors), Nicholas Rescher provides a helpful positioning. — begin paste — Philosophical perspectivism maintains that substantive philosophical positions can be maintained only from a “perspective” of some sort. But what sort? Clearly different sorts of perspectives can be conceived of, […]
    • The Nature and Application of the Daodejing | Ames and Hall (2003)
      Ames and Hall (2003) provide some tips for those studyng the DaoDeJing.
    • Diachronic, diachrony
      Finding proper words to express system(s) change(s) can be a challenge. One alternative could be diachrony. The Oxford English dictionary provides two definitions for diachronic, the first one most generally related to time. (The second is linguistic method) diachronic ADJECTIVE Oxford English Dictionary, s.v. “diachronic (adj.), sense 1,” July 2023, https://doi.org/10.1093/OED/3691792233. For completeness, prochronic relates “to […]
    • Introduction, “Systems Thinking: Selected Readings, volume 2”, edited by F. E. Emery (1981)
      The selection of readings in the “Introduction” to Systems Thinking: Selected Readings, volume 2, Penguin (1981), edited by Fred E. Emery, reflects a turn from 1969 when a general systems theory was more fully entertained, towards an urgency towards changes in the world that were present in 1981. Systems thinking was again emphasized in contrast […]
    • Introduction, “Systems Thinking: Selected Readings”, edited by F. E. Emery (1969)
      In reviewing the original introduction for Systems Thinking: Selected Readings in the 1969 Penguin paperback, there’s a few threads that I only recognize, many years later. The tables of contents (disambiguating various editions) were previously listed as 1969, 1981 Emery, System Thinking: Selected Readings. — begin paste — Introduction In the selection of papers for this […]
    • Concerns with the way systems thinking is used in evaluation | Michael C. Jackson, OBE | 2023-02-27
      In a recording of the debate between Michael Quinn Patton and Michael C. Jackson on “Systems Concepts in Evaluation”, Patton referenced four concepts published in the “Principles for effective use of systems thinking in evaluation” (2018) by the Systems in Evaluation Topical Interest Group (SETIG) of the American Evaluation Society. The four concepts are: (i) […]
  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • RSS on daviding.com

    • 2024/07 Moments July 2024
      Summer festivals and music incubator shows in Toronto, all within biking distance.
    • 2024/06 Moments June 2024
      Summer jazz at the Distillery District, in Washington DC while at the annual systems conference, and then Toronto Jazz Festival
    • 2024/05 Moments May 2024
      Busy May with art university graduate exhibition, travel to UK seeing Edinburgh, Hull, Manchester, London, returning home for wedding in Lefroy, annual cemetery visits with family, and spending time with extended family in from Chicago.
    • 2024/04 Moments April 2024
      Return from visiting family in Vancouver BC, clan events and eldercare appointments
    • 2024/03 Moments March 2024
      More work than play for first part of month, in anticipation of trip to Vancouver to visit family.
    • 2024/02 Moments February 2024
      Chinese New Year celebrations, both public and family, extended over two weekends, due to busy social schedules.
  • RSS on Media Queue

    • What to Do When It’s Too Late | David L. Hawk | 2024
      David L. Hawk (American management theorist, architect, and systems scientist) has been hosting a weekly television show broadcast on Bold Brave Tv from the New York area on Wednesdays 6pm ET, remotely from his home in Iowa. Live, callers can join…Read more ›
    • 2021/06/17 Keekok Lee | Philosophy of Chinese Medicine 2
      Following the first day lecture on Philosophy of Chinese Medicine 1 for the Global University for Sustainability, Keekok Lee continued on a second day on some topics: * Anatomy as structure; physiology as function (and process); * Process ontology, and thing ontology; * Qi ju as qi-in-concentrating mode, and qi san as qi-in-dissipsating mode; and […]
    • 2021/06/16 Keekok Lee | Philosophy of Chinese Medicine 1
      The philosophy of science underlying Classical Chinese Medicine, in this lecture by Keekok Lee, provides insights into ways in which systems change may be approached, in a process ontology in contrast to the thing ontology underlying Western BioMedicine. Read more ›
    • 2021/02/02 To Understand This Era, You Need to Think in Systems | Zeynep Tufekci with Ezra Klein | New York Times
      In conversation, @zeynep with @ezraklein reveal authentic #SystemsThinking in (i) appreciating that “science” is constructed by human collectives, (ii) the west orients towards individual outcomes rather than population levels; and (iii) there’s an over-emphasis on problems of the moment, and…Read more ›
    • 2019/04/09 Art as a discipline of inquiry | Tim Ingold (web video)
      In the question-answer period after the lecture, #TimIngold proposes art as a discipline of inquiry, rather than ethnography. This refers to his thinking On Human Correspondence. — begin paste — [75m26s question] I am curious to know what art, or…Read more ›
    • 2019/10/16 | “Bubbles, Golden Ages, and Tech Revolutions” | Carlota Perez
      How might our society show value for the long term, over the short term? Could we think about taxation over time, asks @carlotaprzperez in an interview: 92% for 1 day; 80% within 1 month; 50%-60% tax for 1 year; zero tax for 10 years.Read more ›
  • Meta

  • Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
    Theme modified from DevDmBootstrap4 by Danny Machal